Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (9): 976-991.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00976
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Wenxin, LI Xi, CHEN Guanghui, CAO Yanmiao()
Received:
2020-10-28
Published:
2021-09-25
Online:
2021-07-22
Contact:
CAO Yanmiao
E-mail:cym8023@126.com
Supported by:
ZHANG Wenxin, LI Xi, CHEN Guanghui, CAO Yanmiao. (2021). The relationship between positive parenting and adolescent prosocial behavior: The mediating role of empathy and the moderating role of the oxytocin receptor gene. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(9), 976-991.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00976
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 SES | 1 | ||||||
2 Gender | 0.04 | 1 | |||||
3 Positive parenting (T1) | 0.17*** | -0.04 | 1 | ||||
4 Cognitive empathy (T2) | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.11*** | 1 | |||
5 Emotional empathy (T2) | 0.01 | -0.15*** | 0.07* | 0.49*** | 1 | ||
6 Prosocial behavior (T1) | 0.15*** | -0.53*** | 0.14*** | 0.16*** | 0.22*** | 1 | |
7 Prosocial behavior (T2) | 0.04 | -0.49*** | 0.09*** | 0.14*** | 0.18*** | 0.53*** | 1 |
M (SD) | 0.00 (1.00) | — | 3.21 (0.52) | 2.94 (0.61) | 2.70 (0.64) | 1.76 (0.46) | 1.77 (0.48) |
Table 1 Pearson correlations among primary variables
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 SES | 1 | ||||||
2 Gender | 0.04 | 1 | |||||
3 Positive parenting (T1) | 0.17*** | -0.04 | 1 | ||||
4 Cognitive empathy (T2) | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.11*** | 1 | |||
5 Emotional empathy (T2) | 0.01 | -0.15*** | 0.07* | 0.49*** | 1 | ||
6 Prosocial behavior (T1) | 0.15*** | -0.53*** | 0.14*** | 0.16*** | 0.22*** | 1 | |
7 Prosocial behavior (T2) | 0.04 | -0.49*** | 0.09*** | 0.14*** | 0.18*** | 0.53*** | 1 |
M (SD) | 0.00 (1.00) | — | 3.21 (0.52) | 2.94 (0.61) | 2.70 (0.64) | 1.76 (0.46) | 1.77 (0.48) |
Model | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA (90% CI) | Path a | Path b | Path c | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive empathy | 6.50 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.072[0.069~0.075] | 0.14*** | 0.14*** | 0.08* | [0.006, 0.028] |
Cognitive empathy (Controlled for T1 prosocial behavior) | 6.41 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.071[0.068~0.074] | 0.14*** | 0.09** | 0.04 | [0.001, 0.020] |
Emotional empathy | 7.49 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.078[0.075~0.081] | 0.09* | 0.14*** | 0.08*. | [-0.001, 0.022] |
Emotional empathy (Controlled for T1 prosocial behavior) | 7.36 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.077[0.074~0.080] | 0.09+ | 0.07+ | 0.04* | [-0.002, 0.013] |
Table 2 Fit indices for the mediation model of empathy, positive parenting and prosocial behavior
Model | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA (90% CI) | Path a | Path b | Path c | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive empathy | 6.50 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.072[0.069~0.075] | 0.14*** | 0.14*** | 0.08* | [0.006, 0.028] |
Cognitive empathy (Controlled for T1 prosocial behavior) | 6.41 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.071[0.068~0.074] | 0.14*** | 0.09** | 0.04 | [0.001, 0.020] |
Emotional empathy | 7.49 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.078[0.075~0.081] | 0.09* | 0.14*** | 0.08*. | [-0.001, 0.022] |
Emotional empathy (Controlled for T1 prosocial behavior) | 7.36 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.077[0.074~0.080] | 0.09+ | 0.07+ | 0.04* | [-0.002, 0.013] |
Variable | Model 1 Dependent variable: Prosocial behavior | Model 2 Dependent variable: Cognitive empathy | Model 3 Dependent variable: Prosocial behavior | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔR2 | b | SE | ΔR2 | b | SE | ΔR2 | b | SE | |
Step 1: SES | 0.24*** | 0.03* | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.24*** | 0.03* | 0.01 |
Gender | -0.47*** | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.04 | -0.47*** | 0.03 | |||
Step 2: Positive parenting | 0.01** | 0.03* | 0.01 | 0.01*** | 0.07*** | 0.02 | 0.01** | 0.03* | 0.01 |
Step 3: Cognitive empathy | 0.01*** | 0.06*** | 0.01 | — | — | — | 0.01*** | 0.06*** | 0.01 |
Step 4: OXTR gene | |||||||||
Dummy coding: AG vs. AA | 0.002 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.03 | |||
GG vs. AA | -0.03 | 0.07 | -0.04 | 0.05 | |||||
Additive coding: OXTR | 0.000 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.02 | |||
Dominant coding: OXTR | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.002 | 0.03 | |||
Recessive coding: OXTR | 0.001 | -0.05 | 0.07 | 0.001 | -0.05 | 0.04 | |||
Step 5: OXTR × Positive parenting | |||||||||
Dummy coding: Positive parenting × AG/AA | 0.01** | -0.11** | 0.04 | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||
Positive parenting × GG/AA | 0.03 | 0.07 | -0.02 | 0.05 | |||||
Additive coding: Positive parenting × OXTR | 0.001 | -0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.003 | 0.02 | |||
Dominant coding: Positive parenting × OXTR | 0.004 | -0.08* | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||
Recessive coding: Positive parenting × OXTR | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.05 |
Table 3 The moderated mediation model
Variable | Model 1 Dependent variable: Prosocial behavior | Model 2 Dependent variable: Cognitive empathy | Model 3 Dependent variable: Prosocial behavior | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔR2 | b | SE | ΔR2 | b | SE | ΔR2 | b | SE | |
Step 1: SES | 0.24*** | 0.03* | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.24*** | 0.03* | 0.01 |
Gender | -0.47*** | 0.03 | -0.04 | 0.04 | -0.47*** | 0.03 | |||
Step 2: Positive parenting | 0.01** | 0.03* | 0.01 | 0.01*** | 0.07*** | 0.02 | 0.01** | 0.03* | 0.01 |
Step 3: Cognitive empathy | 0.01*** | 0.06*** | 0.01 | — | — | — | 0.01*** | 0.06*** | 0.01 |
Step 4: OXTR gene | |||||||||
Dummy coding: AG vs. AA | 0.002 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.03 | |||
GG vs. AA | -0.03 | 0.07 | -0.04 | 0.05 | |||||
Additive coding: OXTR | 0.000 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.02 | |||
Dominant coding: OXTR | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.002 | 0.03 | |||
Recessive coding: OXTR | 0.001 | -0.05 | 0.07 | 0.001 | -0.05 | 0.04 | |||
Step 5: OXTR × Positive parenting | |||||||||
Dummy coding: Positive parenting × AG/AA | 0.01** | -0.11** | 0.04 | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||
Positive parenting × GG/AA | 0.03 | 0.07 | -0.02 | 0.05 | |||||
Additive coding: Positive parenting × OXTR | 0.001 | -0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.003 | 0.02 | |||
Dominant coding: Positive parenting × OXTR | 0.004 | -0.08* | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.03 | |||
Recessive coding: Positive parenting × OXTR | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.05 |
Effect | Subsample 1 | Subsample 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effect | Boot SE | 95% CI | Effect | Boot SE | 95% CI | |
Mediating Effect | ||||||
AA | 0.01 | 0.004 | [0.002, 0.02] | 0.01 | 0.01 | [0.004, 0.03] |
AG | -0.003 | 0.004 | [-0.01, 0.01] | 0.003 | 0.004 | [-0.01, 0.01] |
GG | 0.02 | 0.01 | [0.002, 0.04] | 0.01 | 0.01 | [-0.002, 0.03] |
Moderated Mediation Effect | ||||||
AG vs. AA | -0.01 | 0.01 | [-0.02, 0.000] | -0.01 | 0.01 | [-0.03, -0.0001] |
GG vs. AA | 0.01 | 0.01 | [-0.002, 0.03] | -0.003 | 0.01 | [-0.02, 0.01] |
Table 4 Bootstrap analysis of the moderated mediation model
Effect | Subsample 1 | Subsample 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effect | Boot SE | 95% CI | Effect | Boot SE | 95% CI | |
Mediating Effect | ||||||
AA | 0.01 | 0.004 | [0.002, 0.02] | 0.01 | 0.01 | [0.004, 0.03] |
AG | -0.003 | 0.004 | [-0.01, 0.01] | 0.003 | 0.004 | [-0.01, 0.01] |
GG | 0.02 | 0.01 | [0.002, 0.04] | 0.01 | 0.01 | [-0.002, 0.03] |
Moderated Mediation Effect | ||||||
AG vs. AA | -0.01 | 0.01 | [-0.02, 0.000] | -0.01 | 0.01 | [-0.03, -0.0001] |
GG vs. AA | 0.01 | 0.01 | [-0.002, 0.03] | -0.003 | 0.01 | [-0.02, 0.01] |
[1] |
Aliev, F., Latendresse, S. J., Bacanu, S. A., Neale, M. C., & Dick, D. M. (2014). Testing for measured gene-environment interaction: Problems with the use of cross-product terms and a regression model reparameterization solution. Behavior Genetics, 44(2), 165-181.
doi: 10.1007/s10519-014-9642-1 URL |
[2] |
Augustine, M. E., & Stifter, C. A. (2015). Temperament, parenting, and moral development: Specificity of behavior and context. Social Development, 24(2), 285-303.
doi: 10.1111/sode.12092 pmid: 28670101 |
[3] |
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2014). A sociability gene? Meta-analysis of oxytocin receptor genotype effects in humans. Psychiatric Genetics, 24(2), 45-51.
doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e3283643684 pmid: 23921259 |
[4] | Bartz, J. A., Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. N. (2011). Social effects of oxytocin in humans: Context and person matter. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 301-309. |
[5] |
Batson, C. D., Eklund, J. H., Chermok, V. L., Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G. (2007). An additional antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 65-74.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65 URL |
[6] |
Bradley, B., Davis, T. A., Wingo, A. P., Mercer, K. B., & Ressler, K. J. (2013). Family environment and adult resilience: Contributions of positive parenting and the oxytocin receptor gene. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1), 21659.
doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.21659 URL |
[7] |
Cao, C., Cao, L., & Chen, J. (2019). Differences in sensitivity to environment depending on Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Gene? A meta-analysis of child and adolescent gene-by-environment studies. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(4), 655-667.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01004-3 URL |
[8] |
Cao, C., Rijlaarsdam, J., van der Voort, A., Ji, L., Zhang, W., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2018). Associations between dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) gene, maternal positive parenting and trajectories of depressive symptoms from early to mid-adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(2), 365-379.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0294-5 URL |
[9] |
Carlo, G., White, R. M. B., Streit, C., Knight, G. P., & Zeiders, K. H. (2017). Longitudinal relations among parenting styles, prosocial behaviors, and academic outcomes in U.S. Mexican adolescents. Child Development, 89(2), 577-592.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12761 URL |
[10] |
Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Gene-environment interactions in psychiatry: Joining forces with neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(7), 583-590.
doi: 10.1038/nrn1925 URL |
[11] |
Chen, B., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Ding, X., Guo, X., He, M.,.. Rao, Y. (2018). Nature vs. nurture in human sociality: Multi-level genomic analyses of social conformity. Journal of Human Genetics, 63(5), 605-619.
doi: 10.1038/s10038-018-0418-y URL |
[12] | Chen, F. S., Kumsta, R., von Dawans, B., Monakhov, M., Ebstein, R. P., & Heinrichs, M. (2011). Common oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism and social support interact to reduce stress in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 19937-19942. |
[13] |
Chen, L., Zhang, W. X., Ji, L., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2019). Developmental trajectories of Chinese adolescents’ relational aggression: Associations with changes in social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 90(6), 2153-2170.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.v90.6 URL |
[14] |
Chen, X., Bian, Y., Xin, T., Wang, L., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2010). Perceived social change and childrearing attitudes in China. European Psychologist, 15(4), 260-270.
doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000060 URL |
[15] |
Chen, X., McCormick, E. M., Ravindran, N., McElwain, N. L., & Telzer, E. H. (2020). Maternal emotion socialization in early childhood predicts adolescents’ amygdala-vmPFC functional connectivity to emotion faces. Developmental Psychology, 56(3), 503-515.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000852 pmid: 32077720 |
[16] |
Comings, D. E., & MacMurray, J. P. (2000). Molecular heterosis: A review. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 71(1-2), 19-31.
pmid: 11001792 |
[17] |
Costa, B., Pini, S., Gabelloni, P., Abelli, M., Lari, L., Cardini, A., … Martini, C. (2009). Oxytocin receptor polymorphisms and adult attachment style in patients with depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(10), 1506-1514.
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.05.006 URL |
[18] |
Davis, A. N., & Carlo, G. (2018). The roles of parenting practices, sociocognitive/emotive traits, and prosocial behaviors in low-income adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 62, 140-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.11.011 URL |
[19] | Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(85), |
[20] | Decety, J., Bartal, I. B-A., Uzefovsky, F., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Empathy as a driver of prosocial behavior: Highly conserved neurobehavioral mechanisms across species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1686), 20150077. |
[21] |
de Waal, F. B. M., & Preston, S. D. (2017). Mammalian empathy: Behavioral manifestations and neural basis. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(8), 498-509.
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.72 URL |
[22] |
Dick, D. M., Agrawal, A., Keller, M. C., Adkins, A., Aliev, F., Monroe, S., … Sher, K. J. (2015). Candidate gene-environment interaction research: Reflections and recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 37-59.
doi: 10.1177/1745691614556682 URL |
[23] |
Duncan, L. E., Pollastri, A. R., & Smoller, J. W. (2014). Mind the gap: Why many geneticists and psychological scientists have discrepant views about gene-environment interaction (G×E) research. American Psychologist, 69(3), 249-268.
doi: 10.1037/a0036320 URL |
[24] | Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In M.E. Lamb, & C. Garcia Coll (Vol. Eds.), R.M. Lerner (Series Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3, Social, emotional, and personality development (7th ed., pp. 610-656). New York: Wiley. |
[25] |
Fang, Y., Li, Z., Wu, S., Wang, C., Dong, Y., & He, S. (2020). Oxytocin receptor gene polymorphisms moderate the relationship between job stress and general trust in Chinese Han university teachers. Journal of Affective Disorders, 260, 18-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.080 URL |
[26] |
Fan, X. H., Fang, X. Y., Liu, Y., Lin, X. Y., & Yuan, X. J. (2012). The effect of social support and social identity on the relationship between perceived discrimination and socio-cultural adjustment among Chinese migrant children. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(5), 647-663.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.00647 URL |
[27] |
Feng, C., Lori, A., Waldman, I. D., Binder, E. B., Haroon, E., & Rilling, J. K. (2015). A common oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism modulates intranasal oxytocin effects on the neural response to social cooperation in humans. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 14(7), 516-525.
doi: 10.1111/gbb.12234 URL |
[28] | Field, A. P. (2005). Intraclass correlation. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in the behavioral sciences (pp. 1296-1305). Chichester, England: Wiley. |
[29] |
* Flasbeck, V., Moser, D., Kumsta, R., & Brüne, M. (2018). The OXTR single-nucleotide polymorphism rs53576 moderates the impact of childhood maltreatment on empathy for social pain in female participants: Evidence for differential susceptibility. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 359.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00359 pmid: 30135663 |
[30] | Fortuna, K., & Knafo, A. (2014). Parental and genetic contributions to prosocial behavior during childhood. In L.M. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 70-89). Oxford: Oxford University Press, |
[31] |
Gong, P., Fan, H., Liu, J., Yang, X., Zhang, K., & Zhou, X. (2017). Revisiting the impact of OXTR rs53576 on empathy: A population-based study and a meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 80, 131-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.03.005 URL |
[32] |
Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child's internalization of values: A reconceptualization of current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 4-19.
doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.4 URL |
[33] |
Hackel, L. M., Zaki, J., & van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Social identity shapes social valuation: Evidence from prosocial behavior and vicarious reward. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(8), 1219-1228.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx045 pmid: 28402506 |
[34] |
Hastings, P. D., McShane, K. E., Parker, R., & Ladha, F. (2007). Ready to make nice: Parental socialization of young sons’ and daughters’ prosocial behaviors with peers. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(2), 177-200.
doi: 10.3200/GNTP.168.2.177-200 URL |
[35] | Hastings, P., Miller, J., & T roxel, N. R. (2015) Making good: The socialization of children’s prosocial development. In J. Grusec & P.D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research (pp. 637-666). New York, NY: Guilford Press, |
[36] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press. |
[37] |
He, J., Buil, J. M., Koot, H. M., & van Lier, P. A. C. (2018). Associations between oxytocin receptor (OXTR) genotype and elementary school children’s likability, dis-likability and friendship among classroom peers: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(9), 1799-1812.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0855-0 URL |
[38] | Hoffman, M. L. (1970). Moral development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child development (Vol. 2, pp. 261-359). New York: Wiley. |
[39] | Hoffman, M. L. (1983). Affective and cognitive processes in moral internalization. In E. T. Higgins, D. N. Ruble, & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Social cognition and social development (pp. 236-274). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. |
[40] | Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press. |
[41] |
Hostinar, C. E., Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (2014). Oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism, perceived social support, and psychological symptoms in maltreated adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 26(2), 465-477.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000066 pmid: 24621832 |
[42] | Huang, Y. Q., & Su, Y. J. (2012). The development of empathy across the lifespan: A perspective of double processes. Psychological Development and Education, 28(4), 434-441. |
[43] |
Kennedy, D., & Norman, C. (2005). What don’t we know? Science, 309(5731), 75.
pmid: 15994521 |
[44] |
Kiang, L., Moreno, A. J., & Robinson, J. L. (2004). Maternal preconceptions about parenting predict child temperament, maternal sensitivity, and children’s empathy. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1081-1092.
pmid: 15535758 |
[45] | Kim, E. K., You, S., & Knox, J. (2019). The mediating effect of empathy on the relation between child self-expressiveness in family and prosocial behaviors. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1-10. |
[46] | Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., Sasaki, J. Y., Xu, J., Chu, T. Q., Ryu, C.,.. Taylor, S. E. (2010). Culture, distress, and oxytocin receptor polymorphism (OXTR) interact to influence emotional support seeking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(36), 15717-15721. |
[47] |
Knafo, A., Israel, S., & Ebstein, R. P. (2011). Heritability of children's prosocial behavior and differential susceptibility to parenting by variation in the dopamine receptor D4 gene. Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 53-67.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000647 URL |
[48] |
Knafo-Noam, A., Vertsberger, D., & Israel, S. (2018). Genetic and environmental contributions to children's prosocial behavior: Brief review and new evidence from a reanalysis of experimental twin data. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 60-65.
doi: S2352-250X(17)30162-8 pmid: 28858769 |
[49] |
Kopala‐Sibley, D. C., Cyr, M., Finsaas, M. C., Orawe, J., Huang, A., Tottenham, N., & Klein, D. N. (2018). Early childhood parenting predicts late childhood brain functional connectivity during emotion perception and reward processing. Child Development, 91(1), 110-128.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.v91.1 URL |
[50] |
Lim, D., & DeSteno, D. (2016). Suffering and compassion: The links among adverse life experiences, empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior. Emotion, 16(2), 175-182.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000144 URL |
[51] |
Luo, S., Li, B., Ma, Y., Zhang, W., Rao, Y., & Han, S. (2015). Oxytocin receptor gene and racial ingroup bias in empathy-related brain activity. NeuroImage, 110, 22-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.042 URL |
[52] | Luo, S., Zhang, T., Li, W., Yu, M., Hein, G., & Han, S. (2019). Interactions between oxytocin receptor gene and intergroup relationship on empathic neural responses to others’ pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(5), 505-517. |
[53] |
Masten, C. L., Morelli, S. A., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2011). An fMRI investigation of empathy for ‘social pain’ and subsequent prosocial behavior. NeuroImage, 55(1), 381-388.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.060 URL |
[54] |
Mcdonald, N. M., Baker, J. K., & Messinger, D. S. (2016). Oxytocin and parent-child interaction in the development of empathy among children at risk for autism. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 735-745.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000104 URL |
[55] |
McQuaid, R. J., McInnis, O. A., Stead, J. D., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2013). A paradoxical association of an oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism: Early-life adversity and vulnerability to depression. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 128.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00128 pmid: 23898235 |
[56] |
Meyer-Lindenberg, A, & Weinberger, D. R. (2006). Intermediate phenotypes and genetic mechanisms of psychiatric disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(10), 818-827.
pmid: 16988657 |
[57] |
Moons, W. G., Way, B. M., & Taylor, S. E. (2014). Oxytocin and vasopressin receptor polymorphisms interact with circulating neuropeptides to predict human emotional reactions to stress. Emotion, 14(3), 562-572.
doi: 10.1037/a0035503 URL |
[58] |
Newton, E. K., Laible, D., Carlo, G., Steele, J. S., & McGinley, M. (2014). Do sensitive parents foster kind children, or vice versa? Bidirectional influences between children’s prosocial behavior and parental sensitivity. Developmental Psychology, 50(6), 1808-1816.
doi: 10.1037/a0036495 pmid: 24708456 |
[59] |
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., Christensen, K. J., & Yorgason, J. B. (2012). Bidirectional relations between authoritative parenting and adolescents’ prosocial behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(3), 400-408.
doi: 10.1111/jora.2012.22.issue-3 URL |
[60] |
Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Christensen, K. J. (2011). Empathy and self-regulation as mediators between parenting and adolescents' prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 545-551.
doi: 10.1111/jora.2011.21.issue-3 URL |
[61] |
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nielson, M. G., & Day, R. D. (2016). The role of parental warmth and hostility on adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward multiple targets. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(3), 331-340.
doi: 10.1037/fam0000157 pmid: 26414417 |
[62] |
Reiner, I., Frieling, H., Beutel, M., & Michal, M. (2016). Gene-environment interaction of the oxytocin receptor gene polymorphism (rs53576) and unresolved attachment status predict depersonalization symptoms: An exploratory study. Psychological Studies, 61(4), 295-300.
doi: 10.1007/s12646-016-0378-2 URL |
[63] |
Rilling, J. K., DeMarco, A. C., Hackett, P. D., Chen, X., Gautam, P., Stair, S.,.. Pagnoni, G. (2014). Sex differences in the neural and behavioral response to intranasal oxytocin and vasopressin during human social interaction. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 39, 237-248.
doi: S0306-4530(13)00341-7 pmid: 24157401 |
[64] |
Poulin, M. J., Holman, E. A., & Buffone, A. (2012). The neurogenetics of nice: Receptor genes for oxytocin and vasopressin interact with threat to predict prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 23(5), 446-452.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611428471 URL |
[65] |
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Abu-Akel, A. (2016). The social salience hypothesis of oxytocin. Biological Psychiatry, 79(3), 194-202.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.07.020 pmid: 26321019 |
[66] |
Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 855-863.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.011 URL |
[67] |
Siu, A. M. H., & Shek, D. T. L. (2005). Validation of the interpersonal reactivity index in a Chinese context. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 118-126.
doi: 10.1177/1049731504270384 URL |
[68] |
Smearman, E. L., Winiarski, D. A., Brennan, P. A., Najman, J., & Johnson, K. C. (2015). Social stress and the oxytocin receptor gene interact to predict antisocial behavior in an at-risk cohort. Development and Psychopathology, 27(1), 309-318.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000649 pmid: 25003328 |
[69] |
Starr, L. R., Hammen, C., Conway, C. C., Raposa, E., & Brennan, P. A. (2014). Sensitizing effect of early adversity on depressive reactions to later proximal stress: Moderation by polymorphisms in serotonin transporter and corticotropin releasing hormone receptor genes in a 20-year longitudinal study. Development and Psychopathology, 26(4), 1241-1254.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579414000996 URL |
[70] |
Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63(5), 1266-1281.
pmid: 1446552 |
[71] | Tost, H., Kolachana, B., Hakimi, S., Lemaitre, H., Verchinski, B. A., Mattay, V. S., … Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2010). A common allele in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) impacts prosocial temperament and human hypothalamic-limbic structure and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(31), 13936-13941. |
[72] |
Uzefovsky, F., Shalev, I., Israel, S., Edelman, S., Raz, Y., Mankuta, D., … Ebstein, R. P. (2015). Oxytocin receptor and vasopressin receptor 1a genes are respectively associated with emotional and cognitive empathy. Hormones and Behavior, 67, 60-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.11.007 pmid: 25476609 |
[73] | van Roekel, E., Verhagen, M., Scholte, R. H. J., Kleinjan, M., Goossens, L., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2013). The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) in relation to state levels of loneliness in adolescence: Evidence for micro-level gene-environment interactions. PLoSONE, 8(11), e77689. |
[74] |
Vrshek-Schallhorn, S., Stroud, C. B., Mineka, S., Zinbarg, R. E., Adam, E. K., Redei, E. E.,.. Craske, M. G. (2015). Additive genetic risk from five serotonin system polymorphisms interacts with interpersonal stress to predict depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124(4), 776-790.
doi: 10.1037/abn0000098 pmid: 26595467 |
[75] |
Wang, S. Q., Zhang, W. X., Chen, L., Li, H. L., Li, C., & Zhou, L. N. (2011). A multitrait-multimethod analysis of aggressive behaviors in middle childhood. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(3), 294-307.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2011.00294 URL |
[76] |
Wen, Z. L., & Ye, B. J. (2014). Different methods for testing moderated mediation models: Competitors or backups? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(5), 714-726.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00714 URL |
[77] |
Wu, N., & Su, Y. (2015). Oxytocin receptor gene relates to theory of mind and prosocial behavior in children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16(2), 302-313.
doi: 10.1080/15248372.2013.858042 URL |
[78] |
Yamasue, H. (2013). Function and structure in social brain regions can link oxytocin-receptor genes with autistic social behavior. Brain and Development, 35(2), 111-118.
doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2012.08.010 URL |
[79] |
Yan, Z. Q., & Su, Y. J. (2021). Difference between cognitive empathy and affective empathy in development: Meta-analysis preliminary exploration. Psychological Development and Education, 37(1), 1-9.
doi: 10.1017/edp.2020.6 URL |
[80] | Yorgason, J. B., & Gustafson, K. B. (2014). Linking grandparent involvement with the development of prosocial behavior in adolescents. Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach, 201-217. |
[81] |
* Yu, X. Q., Dong. Y., Li, Z. N., Fang, Y., Wu, S., Wang, C., & He, S. C. (2020). Work stress and general trust: The mediating effect of depression and the moderating effect of the OXTR gene rs53576. Journal of Affective Disorders, 272, 283-288.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.160 URL |
[82] | Zhang, F. F., Dong, Y., Wang, K., Zhan, Z. Y., & Xie, L. F. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index-C. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 155-157. |
[83] |
Zhang, W., Wei, X., Ji, L., Chen, L., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2017). Reconsidering parenting in Chinese culture: Subtypes, stability, and change of maternal parenting style during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(5), 1117-1136.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0664-x URL |
[84] |
* Zheng, S., Masuda, T., Matsunaga, M., Noguchi, Y., Ohtsubo, Y., Yamasue, H., & Ishii, K. (2020). Oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) and childhood adversity influence trust. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 121, 104840.
doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104840 URL |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||